Reranker models

A final relevance check, tuned to your data

A reranker provides the final relevance check before generation. The K² reranker examines each query and candidate together using a cross-encoder trained on the ambiguities and hard negatives surfaced by the retrieval stage. It does more than reorder a list: it separates stronger evidence from plausible near-misses.

System context

Learns the retrieval stack's blind spots

The reranker trains on the same adversarial negatives as your dense and sparse encoders, so it understands why each candidate surfaced and how to correct it.

  • Cross-encoder reads query + document together for nuance.
  • Shared negatives teach it to fix the stack's recurring misses.
Confidence

Scores that support production thresholds

Outputs are calibrated relevance scores, not just ranks, so you can enforce answer or deferral thresholds per workflow.

  • Set "only answer if score ≥ threshold" rules per workflow.
  • Instrument automatic escalations when confidence dips.
Operations

Telemetry wired for drift detection

Dashboards and hooks ship with the model so you can monitor health, spot degradation, and retrain before incidents.

  • Score distributions stream into existing observability.
  • Feedback loops push tough examples back into training.

Why a K² reranker is different

The final ranking stage is tuned to your domain and evaluated on the queries that matter to it.

System-aware fine-tuning

Training the reranker on the same hard negatives as the retrievers helps it learn recurring failure modes and score candidates against the same relevance objective.

Deep contextual analysis

Cross-encoder architectures read the query and document together (`[CLS] query [SEP] document [SEP]`) to distinguish strong matches from plausible near-misses.

Calibrated for confidence

Outputs are calibrated relevance scores, not just a new order. Set answer thresholds, reduce unsupported responses, and define when the system should defer.